In all seriousness

[Tossem]

I just have a question for the admins. Its clearly not affecting the end results. however, with the risk it causes to the authenticity of the league. Why are we as a community allowing jammzz or therefore anyone to mass games vs 1 player in order to boost score. It doesn't seem to be a good idea to let this behavior continue.

Maybe Im not fully understanding the league as is but thought someone should speak up.

[LivE.SworD]

Once seasons last long enough for people to reach the A+, K and S ranks, you have no chance of keeping up by playing vs D rank players. You simply get too few points at those ranks, vs low ranks. We saw this last season pretty clearly. This season is relatively young so this strategy seems to be paying off, but once people reach those high ranks it'll falter pretty reliably

[Tossem]

I completely agree jacek. I was alluring to the idea of what if these behaviors get copied by people capable of taking it much further? since there is nothing ( I know of) in place then to punish this upon its arrival wouldn't sit too well.

I guess I'm implying why not add something simple now so that down the line there is NOTHING to even worry about popping up as an issue.

[sNipEr.ScopE]

I say just give him the ban just because

[LivE.SworD]

I completely agree jacek. I was alluring to the idea of what if these behaviors get copied by people capable of taking it much further? since there is nothing ( I know of) in place then to punish this upon its arrival wouldn't sit too well.

I guess I'm implying why not add something simple now so that down the line there is NOTHING to even worry about popping up as an issue.

Having extra rules, like only allowing people to play N games vs the same person in one day, would add extra complexity and more policing work that I'm not sure is worth it or something we have time for. It would open up more possibilities of abuse by having people smurf new accounts to get around such limits. The only real rule here is that all games must be legit, with both sides intending to win. This can be abused either way. As long as this kind of abuse isn't happening then jamjazz isn't breaking the rules

[Tossem]

Okay, I understand. Well thought out man. I see everything you're saying.

[invokador]

to ban jamzz do you need proof? is that answer seriously? The tests themselves are in his scw history, he always plays with people D and D- and never with people higher than those 2, even though he is in A- he continues to play with people D and D-, he always plays with neo.blukduck to which he created 4 or 5 akas this season so that he can play and score points and in all the games I demand that he play only with Z, because I do not think it is a coincidence that all his games come out Z to his opponent Neo.BlukDuck (neo.teleeport etc etc) It should be fair that players older than C do not earn more than 5 points with people of rank D

[JSaMuEL]

player jamzzz should be punished for playing most games with one player and avoiding playing other players of the same level

[jAmZzZ]

Hahahaha

Hater n00bs.
Top10 haters never susrender🤣🤣
The most people who are complaints against me have lost on 1v1
For example i beat Invokador 3-0 for scw

All my games are legitims.
You are really ridiculous n00bs.😂

[Think-Fast]

Jamzzz you have never been top ten stop saying that

[thepigspeaks]

I'm actually kind of impressed at this guy's dedication to pussydodging.  Props to you jamzzz.

[heavymachinegun]

is this starcraft world or starcraft joke? 🤔

[RJBTV]

aww jeez, looks like we'll have to pretend to be neo.teeleport again.

[La.h1pp13]

why y'all care about a noob doing his noob thing? Not a single person here thinks he is good. Periodt.

[Oi7iuM[gK]]

what about a rule where the top 5 or 10 are obligated to play each other in a bo7 once a week,hes not breaking any rules and the way the point system is set up it isnt going to work in his favor on the long term.i would like to read some suggestion on how to deal with this circumstance ,its not like theres anything  i can  about it  but im sure that if a reasonable option other than “Ban his Ass” emerges the admins might take it into consideration