StarCraft World
GENERAL => General Discussion => Topic started by: InFaMouS]reeKo on July 05, 2023, 10:38:25 am
-
I’m going ahead and making a thread about this. There is some new sheriffs in town working on some exciting new things for the league. I’m super excited about it and it’s gonna bring me back to being more of an active gamer on broodwar. Everyone post suggestions or ideas on what you would like to see implemented into the future seasons of SCW. No BM here please.
Let’s get it - reeKO
-
having a prize for winning. point reward system for choosing specific matchups. like PP v PP (more incentive) . End tourney has a system where each team gets to choose its race maybe 2 of bo9.... so 2 games Pr 2 games whatever they choose(higher rank gets to choose game 9 mu).
tracking system showing players best race and best ally's stats also worst race and worst ally full stats.
-
1.To avoid the endless problem of dodging:
for B, A or S players there must be an option in the scw page where u can officially challenge other B, A or S player for a match or bo3,5.
if within a week the other player just ignore or refuse it, there may be like a points penalty for him
2. I want to check my historical records against one specific player in all scw seasons,but currently that option doesn't exist. It will be great to have it
-
I like ryus idea a lot. I have many examples of players refusing/dodging or choosing to 2s instead (all the time) even when there are no 2s games
-
All great ideas….you guys think we should allow one account per IP address?
-
1.To avoid the endless problem of dodging:
for B, A or S players there must be an option in the scw page where u can officially challenge other B, A or S player for a match or bo3,5.
if within a week the other player just ignore or refuse it, there may be like a points penalty for him
2. I want to check my historical records against one specific player in all scw seasons,but currently that option doesn't exist. It will be great to have it
I disagree for the fact that with in a week isn’t much time for ppl to both agree on a time and it work with the work schedule. It isn’t fair that I tell Tom I can only play on days he works and make him lose points because of it.
Ip thing isn’t needed, we just need to start punishing the ones that troll the forums. Example, Carvusis brought up my daughter a few months back. There should be more than just a warning message. It would be nice to know who’s talking shit but ppl can mask their ips.
Let’s thank about positive things to help the website and not so much the people using it.
Like bonus matches, I loved that and ppl would pick m.u for the extra points. Or maybe hold a mid season tournament for top 9 to force the top players to play.
-
There should be a penalty for reeks trying to noob bash blackduck and Losing like the pub he is Gg
-
There should be a penalty for reeks trying to noob bash blackduck and Losing like the pub he is Gg
LOL
-
1.To avoid the endless problem of dodging:
for B, A or S players there must be an option in the scw page where u can officially challenge other B, A or S player for a match or bo3,5.
if within a week the other player just ignore or refuse it, there may be like a points penalty for him
2. I want to check my historical records against one specific player in all scw seasons,but currently that option doesn't exist. It will be great to have it
I like that idea also the point system could be balanced closer to an elo system so it isn't possible to just noob bash to high rank
-
bump
-
Reward winstreaker’s like HyDrA with extra points or even bounty points for winning against someone you couldn’t beat 5-10 games or something.
-
End of season tournaments where dodgers have to play vs the other top players to prove they're worthy of being at the top. Just sucks end of season tournaments are a pain because these same dodgers dodge in the end of season tournaments.
Could add a rule where if someone in the top 5 has not played at least a total of 15-20 games against the other top 5 players they are not eligable for the end of season tournament.
-
We would put the country where we from.
-
There's would be a punishment if you don't play with same ranks. ( 5~8 % of ladderpoint)
If you don't play at least 5 games in a week with those ranks (-2<your Rank< any higher rank )
For example
You are B+ ( You can only play with (B-/B)< B+< any higher rank ) to not get penalized
Yes , you can play any other ranks if you want but you'll get penalized.
-
Why always punish? It should simply be possible that with the same rank there are additional points. E.g. 5 games against the same rank +100 points automatically 10 games + 250 points, 15 games 400, 20 games 600 or smth.
-
Why always punish? It should simply be possible that with the same rank there are additional points. E.g. 5 games against the same rank +100 points automatically 10 games + 250 points, 15 games 400, 20 games 600 or smth.
it could be abused
-
There's would be a punishment if you don't play with same ranks. ( 5~8 % of ladderpoint)
If you don't play at least 5 games in a week with those ranks (-2<your Rank< any higher rank )
For example
You are B+ ( You can only play with (B-/B)< B+< any higher rank ) to not get penalized
Yes , you can play any other ranks if you want but you'll get penalized.
finding a game would be more difficult than it is now with few players in op ugl
-
There's would be a punishment if you don't play with same ranks. ( 5~8 % of ladderpoint)
If you don't play at least 5 games in a week with those ranks (-2<your Rank< any higher rank )
For example
You are B+ ( You can only play with (B-/B)< B+< any higher rank ) to not get penalized
Yes , you can play any other ranks if you want but you'll get penalized.
finding a game would be more difficult than it is now with few players in op ugl
It will work to force high ranks to not dogde each others.
-
I like a lot of the suggestions here. Open for whatever, just start the next season!! Gogogo!!
-
I've always liked the idea of bonus points for the m/u of the day kind of thing
-
All great ideas….you guys think we should allow one account per IP address?
for once, Reeko, I do agree with you; however, there is absolutely no way to enforce due to one simple reason: VPN